Good Info
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
     
Categories

Accessories
Arts
Arts and Crafts
Automotive
Business
Business Management
Career
Cars and Trucks
CGI
Coding Sites
Computers
Computers and Technology
Cooking
Crafts
Current Affairs
Databases
Education
Entertainment
Film
Finances
Gardening
Healthy Living
Holidays
Home
Home Management
Internet
Medical
Medical Business
Medicines and Remedies
Men Only
Motorcyles
Our Pets
Outdoors
Pets
Psychiatry & Mental Heal
Recreation
Relationships
Religion
Self Improvement
Society
Sports
Staying Fit
Technology
Travel
Web Design
Weddings
Wellness, Fitness and Di
Women Only
Womens Interest
Writing
 
Stats
Total Articles: 812275
Total Authors: 80017


Newest Member
Dave Ditz

Flooding: The Risks for Design Consultants


By: Alex Harper
Submitted: 2008-11-03 18:13:58 | Word Count: 623


Managing Risk

As far as possible a structured approach should be taken to minimise flood risks on construction projects which will involve:

[ advertisement ]

• Assessing the risks

• Avoiding risks where possible

• Where risks cannot be avoided, taking due cognisance of the risks in the design and providing appropriate advice and warning to the client

Assessing the Risks

On any construction project there are likely to be two separate but related considerations:

• Is the proposed structure itself vulnerable to flooding?

• Is construction of the proposed structure likely to increase the risk of flooding elsewhere? This in turn requires consideration of the separate risks involved in the process of construction (risks arising from temporary works and which may or may not be the responsibility of the professional) and risks arising from the mere presence and/or operation of the permanent works.

Flood prevention works fall into a category of their own where the consequences of failure may be catastrophic. Any significant project is likely to involve a desk study of more or less detail. The desk study should include investigations into the flooding history of the site.

A desk study is likely to highlight risk factors for a locality which will need to be supplemented by site investigations such as ground investigations and topographical surveys.

If site investigations are provided by the client or commissioned from other consultants, the professional can generally expect to rely on them but he is not absolved of the responsibility to consider their adequacy. If they are inadequate, the client should be told. If the design is based on assumptions, the design assumptions should be spelt out.

Document the Risk

Whether or not formal reports are issued to a client, risks identified by the consultant should be discussed with the client and those discussions documented. A client may not be willing to incur the cost of flood mitigation measures which the consultant considers advisable. Such advice should be put in writing. An ‘audit trail’ will greatly assist the defence of any future claim.

Contractual Considerations

The first and most obvious advice point to make is that the consultant should ensure that he has a written contract which, amongst other things, clearly sets out the scope of the services that he has agreed to provide.

Liability arising from provision of those services can be limited or in some circumstances excluded. Contractual provisions that a consultant should consider as a matter of course (both in relation to flooding risks and more generally) include:

• Excluding liability for default of sub-consultants appointed with the agreement of the client

• Excluding liability for consequential losses

• Limiting liability to a specified sum (liability should be capped at a level not exceeding the amount of the consultant’s professional indemnity insurance cover)

• Restricting liability to the consultant’s fair share of a loss on the assumption that other responsible parties will meet their own fair share of the loss (by means of a net contribution clause)

• Appropriate exclusions or caveats, particularly where the consultant is acting in an advisory role or providing a survey report

Conclusion

Risks of flooding, like many other risks encountered in construction works can be managed provided that they are recognised and properly assessed. Liability for risks that cannot be avoided or designed out may be mitigated by appropriate use of contractual exclusions and limitations.

This document does not present a complete or comprehensive statement of fact or the law, nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight issues that might be of interest; specialist legal advice may be required where appropriate.

Author Resource:- Paul berg is the owner of Griffiths & Armour Professional Risks which acts as manager for the professional indemnity division of Griffiths & Armour. Griffiths & Armour provide professional indemnity cover, construction liability insurance and risk management advice.

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
New Members
Nav Menu
Sponsors



Featured Authors
Name: Angie Alexandra
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: Northern Scotland
State: Northern Scotland
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Fanpage Automatic
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: W. Olympic Blvd
State: Los Angeles
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Vent Utter
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: London
State: United Kingdom
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Pierre Hage
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: Boston
State: MA
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Alex Steward
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: NA
State: NA
View My Bio & Articles