Good Info
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
     
Categories

Accessories
Arts
Arts and Crafts
Automotive
Business
Business Management
Career
Cars and Trucks
CGI
Coding Sites
Computers
Computers and Technology
Cooking
Crafts
Current Affairs
Databases
Education
Entertainment
Film
Finances
Gardening
Healthy Living
Holidays
Home
Home Management
Internet
Medical
Medical Business
Medicines and Remedies
Men Only
Motorcyles
Our Pets
Outdoors
Pets
Psychiatry & Mental Heal
Recreation
Relationships
Religion
Self Improvement
Society
Sports
Staying Fit
Technology
Travel
Web Design
Weddings
Wellness, Fitness and Di
Women Only
Womens Interest
Writing
 
Stats
Total Articles: 811910
Total Authors: 80017


Newest Member
Dave Ditz

Fire Risk Assessment Reviews


By: William Jackson
Submitted: 2010-11-19 00:17:28 | Word Count: 389


Most employers and duty holders understand the importance of conducting a fire risk assessment in the workplace (a requirement under the Regulatory Reform [Fire Safety] Order 2005), but it is important to remember that this only provides a ‘snap shot in time’.

Regular reviews of the fire risk assessment should be carried out and for most work places an annual appraisal is sufficient; however the fire risk assessment document should be updated whenever there are changes to the building, the occupants or plant and materials used on the site.

[ advertisement ]

It is also important to monitor the effectiveness of the resultant fire control plans to ensure that actions are implemented as recommended in the fire risk assessment and measures continue to meet the needs of the organisation.

There are a number of high profile cases that illustrate the importance of fire risk assessment reviews and 2009 saw one of the highest fines imposed under the legislation:

Shell International Ltd was fined £300,000 with costs of £45,000 after pleading guilty to serious breaches of the Regulatory Reform Order. The London Fire Brigade prosecuted Shell after two fires occurred less than one month apart at the Shell Centre in York Road, London in January 2007.

It was discovered that Shell’s in-house fire risk assessment had not been reviewed or updated since March 2003. The 2003 fire risk assessment had identified many of the same failings that were documented during the inspection in 2007. Assistant Commissioner Steve Turek said, “Shell failed to respond properly to their risk assessment for three and a half years and had it not been for the fires which led to the inspection, it could have been considerably longer. Had Shell acted upon the findings of the 2003 risk assessment at the time, they would have avoided putting their staff at risk.”

It is important that those responsible for fire safety treat their fire risk assessment as a ‘live document’ that requires regular attention rather than seeing it as a means to meet legislation before being ‘shelved’.

For more information about risk assessment or managing risks, please contact Nemco Utilities at www.nemco-utilities.co.uk

Author Resource:- The author has extensive expertise in the field of fire risk assessment. He is one of the most reputed person in this field and has actively been involved in various steps taken for fire risk assessment UK.

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
New Members
Nav Menu
Sponsors



Featured Authors
Name: Angie Alexandra
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: Northern Scotland
State: Northern Scotland
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Fanpage Automatic
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: W. Olympic Blvd
State: Los Angeles
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Vent Utter
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: London
State: United Kingdom
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Pierre Hage
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: Boston
State: MA
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Alex Steward
Joined: 2012-05-21
City: NA
State: NA
View My Bio & Articles