Shoes Product Quality: Enterprise Standard and National standards
By: lili smith
Submitted: 2010-11-04 21:10:30 | Word Count: 494
Ms. Lu in a mall to buy a pair of leather boots, the commitment to a penalty at ten shopping malls. Ms. Lu later to the courts to challenge the non-leather shoes, some two-thirds of production, that the mall selling "fake", ask for compensation 10 times the purchase Nike Air Max 2010 shoes. Ms. Lu was identified but did not pay application fees for the accreditation, before the results can only take losing.
Ms. Lu in a mall to buy a pair of black leather boots for women, shopping for her issued sales invoices, that the shoe is on the shoe leather fashion Air Max Nike shoes, quality grade for the qualification, implementation of standards for QB/T002-2005, shopping malls also specify a penalty at ten. Later, Ms. Lu found that the two-woman boots are not leather upper material part of the production, that a mall is the sale of counterfeit leather products, will be prosecuted to the court of a mall.
[ advertisement ]
Ms. Lu believes that since the shoes indicate a quality standard, the standard product name should be marked major upper material, but the defendant fails to department store sales of products to do the real dimension of the standard, constitute a commercial fraud. Shopping made false promises of a fine of ten, so the defendant requested the court to pay 1980 yuan. The defendant argued that shopping malls, the state does not provide for fashion shoes leather upper materials must be marked, they sell the factory quality inspection of products, there is no selling fake products.
Both the focus of controversy in the courts is marked leather dress shoes with leather uppers whether the material does not meet national quality standards. To this end, Ms. Lu apply to the court by the relevant professional departments of the State to identify the shoes, this appraisal fees if Ms. Lu in favor of the defendant bear the mall, on the contrary by Ms. Lu commitment. Within the prescribed time Ms. Lu appraisal fee is not prepaid to the court. Recently, Sha District Court of the view that the plaintiff is not prepaid within the specified time appraisal fee, no other evidence that the shoes do not meet national quality standards, therefore, dismissed the verdict Ms. Lu's claim
Reporter to the authorities learned that the product quality to national standards prevail, can not determine whether the quality of corporate compliance standards. In that case, both sides involved in women's nike air max 90 boots are in line with national standards of a dispute, Ms. Lu to give up the lead to lost pay appraisal fee, consumers should learn a lesson.
