Good Info
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
     
Categories

Accessories
Arts
Arts and Crafts
Automotive
Business
Business Management
Career
Cars and Trucks
CGI
Coding Sites
Computers
Computers and Technology
Cooking
Crafts
Current Affairs
Databases
Education
Entertainment
Film
Finances
Gardening
Healthy Living
Holidays
Home
Home Management
Internet
Medical
Medical Business
Medicines and Remedies
Men Only
Motorcyles
Our Pets
Outdoors
Pets
Psychiatry & Mental Heal
Recreation
Relationships
Religion
Self Improvement
Society
Sports
Staying Fit
Technology
Travel
Web Design
Weddings
Wellness, Fitness and Di
Women Only
Womens Interest
Writing
 
Stats
Total Articles: 811910
Total Authors: 79955


Newest Member
beta soft

Scott Monge Wins Wrongful Death Case for Client Exposed to Asbestos


By: Arthur Cooper
Submitted: 2010-10-23 20:54:09 | Word Count: 664


FACTS: Plaintiff’s decedent was employed for approximately 14 years at a glass manufacturing facility which was located in Johnson City, Tennessee. During his employment, decedent worked as an assembly line worker. In July 2000, after plaintiff had been retired for a number of years, he was diagnosed with mesothelioma, In August 2002, decedent died from the disease. Plaintiff alleged that during home repair project and during decedent’s employment at the glass manufacturing facility, decedent had been exposed to multiple products which contained asbestos and had been manufactured and distributed by the various defendants companies. Further, plaintiff maintained that decedent developed mesothelioma and died because of his exposure to these products. Plaintiff pursued products liability theories, including failure to warrant negligence theories against the defendants, Defendants contended their individual products which contained asbestos could not have individually released enough fibers to be a causative agent for mesothelioma. Further, defendants argued that some of the products which plaintiff was alleging were harmful, did not even contain asbestos. All rights to the use of reproduction of this case summary are reserved to JAS Publications, Copyright 2003.

ALLEGED INJURY: Wrongful death. Decedent was survived by his wife and two adult children.

[ advertisement ]

EXPERT WITNESSES: Plaintiff: Eugene J. Mark, M.D. – Pulmonary Pathologist; Boston, MA Arnold Brody, Ph.D. – Biologist/ Asbestos Diseases; New Orleans, LA Edwin C. Holstein, M.S. – Occupational Medicine; Auburndale, MA William Ewing – Industrial Hygienist; Atlanta, GA Richard Hatfield – Industrial Hygienist; Atlanta, GA Defendant: N/A

EDITOR’S NOTE: Per plaintiff’s counsel Guerry, Defendant A C

Author Resource:- Click here to read the rest of Scott Monge. If you enjoyed this article, you also might like our other stories about Scott G. Monge.

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
New Members
Nav Menu
Sponsors



Featured Authors
Name: Lorenzo Bouche
Joined: 2012-05-20
City: West Sussex
State: Surrey
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Joseph Batchelor
Joined: 2012-05-20
City: Chicago
State: IL
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Vision Services
Joined: 2012-05-20
City: Ahmedabad
State: Gujarat
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Tripti Sharma
Joined: 2012-05-20
City: Bangalore
State: West Bengal
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Brian Buck
Joined: 2012-05-20
City: Phoenix
State: AZ
View My Bio & Articles