Ayn Rand, the founding father of Objectivism, was an idea to Frank R Wallace. Ayn Rand's influence on early versions of Neo-Tech Power is obvious. Wallace showed nice admiration for Objectivism, significantly Ayn Rand's novel Atlas Shrugged.
Frank R Wallace quoted Ayn Rand saying 'save me from the Randians'. Ayn Rand was her self repulsed by the cult-ish obsession coming back from Objectivists at that time.
[ advertisement ]
Neo-Tech sought to convert that rigid dogmatic cult following of Ayn Rand into a highly leveraged force of intelligence and influence.
Objectivism extended Aristotle's philosophy of A 'is' A, but Alfred Korzybski took 'is' away. Frank R Wallace replaced it all with Neo-Tech Objectivism.
Wallace once recommended that Ayn Rand's character John Galt had influential powers probably beyond realistic possibility. Ayn Rand claimed that her hero's revealed the truth of man. Ayn Rand's Objectivism looks to possess provided no such real life hero (that I'm aware of). Wallace's Neo-Tech later went on to describe The Greatest Discovery Ever! and therefore the 'wpgsh' phenomenon of societal influence.
Of course, reading Ayn Rand's early fiction, you'll clearly see a natural dislike of reality that Rand seems to possess imbued. Cuts from The Fountainhead show Howard Roarke as virtually schizophrenic in his lack of mindfulness. I appear to recollect the character even claiming he was incapable of love. He clearly appeared that manner within the cut edits that never made it into the published version of The Fountainhead. Neo-Tech approaches human experience from a terribly different angle. Neo-Tech's evolution rises from research into the history of love, with human happiness as being the primary goal. This was not clearly expressed in Ayn Rand's writings. Maybe it would have been her next novel.
I think Ayn Rand's Objectivism cleared a path for Neo-Tech to evolve for providing the 'human' facet of the exhausting facts of reality.
Similarities between Neo-Tech and Objectivism
Both Neo-Tech and Objectivism posit the primacy of existence to consciousness. In easier language that merely means that reality exists 'before' consciousness features a place to exist. Platonic mysticism and Kant would argue that consciousness is primary, that reality is seated at intervals this factor we tend to decision consciousness. Both Neo-Tech and Objectivism strongly disagree.
Difference between Neo-Tech and Objectivism
Objectivism used 5 classifications of philosophy. Here they are with Objectivism keyword for each class within the brackets.
I'm visiting decision them Objectivism Metaphysics (reality), Objectivism Epistemology (data), Objectivism Politics (capitalism), Objectivism Aesthetics (never defined), and Objectivism Ethics (selfishness).
Neo-Tech's definitions for Neo-Tech Metaphysics (business), Neo-Tech Epistemology (Neo-Think), Neo-Tech Politics (), Neo-Tech Ethics (), and Neo-Tech Aesthetics (worth reflection).
Maybe Frank R Wallace and Ayn Rand would have come back to rather slender agreements during a personal discussion. Wallace would definitely have seen so much and wide. Ayn Rand may have slapped his face.
Neo-Tech broadens the reach of Objectivism, both philosophically, and commercially.
Author Resource:-
Smith Richardson has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Personal Tech (Computers and Technology), you can also check out his latest website about:
