By: Vlad Vistac
Submitted: 2010-07-28 11:56:01 | Word Count: 510
When someone calims expertise in search engine opimization, and states categoriically that something is admitted, other proofessionals, without reference to the statistical test you are left with few opions.
Just beklieve it and stop doing what you have done unmtil now and subscribe to their competing philosoplhy kumbaya blogs.
Keep dong what countless experts have told you work for them, wortks for them for sevral years, and most likely will continue to work until some monumrental changes in the algorithm of Google
[ advertisement ]
Go on the offensive call it as a garbage SEO, and see if they can come up with evidnece
Create a public case of a test to prove that they are wrong
Option 1 for sheep
Option 2 has merit - just go about your business, and feel happy that they are robbing 1,000 people with their brand of cool aid and strengthen compteitive advantage.
Option 3 is gay, maybe even good for short term liinkbait, but not really squash "the opinion of another perosn, withouyt actual evidence.
Option 4 smrat option
Thus, today we are testing the anchor text and whether it is passed as rating facytor from the article directoyr page destination.
It is not a statistical test, and in many resects little flaws
Anchor text, we use unique to the Internet - if the phrase is unique to the Internet, Google may be more inclined to believe the text of an anchor.
This article may eevntually syndicated to othre sites, so it does not prove that a link from an article directory intendeed. However, as the argument decided around the time of pointless to use arrticle marketing for SEO, if the articple is more syndicated it the benefit of article marketing.
This is just one test that can be easily compromised by a thhird party, whille it would be fine.
I will not use arrticle spining to try to make each article unique presentation, and I do not intend to isolate just one direectory, articcles, as it would be ubnfair to subject them to such a check in the staate ... I'm sure there are some article directories that do not pass ranking fzactors from their pages becuase of paid links.
It also depneds on the whims of the moderators article directory. This is a blaatant attempt to allocate part of their benefits, wihch are often undrestimated. "Pure" authors of the artticle mrketing is not just writing articles for SEO purposes. They like the written form, it is their passino, they survive on the written form is not SEO, or write to broader impact of their ideas or talens.
Therre are also many artilce dirctories that use microformat relative = "NOFOLLOW" withiin their anchor links. This is what I recommend, if the owenrs do not trust the article directory of their authors, or do not have time to constantly moniotr the existing references to changes in reputation. If your site links to 100,000 ohter sites monitoring them on a permanent bassis for malware is not a trivial task, although there are technological soluttions.
Author Resource:-
We can provide you with
text spinner Thank You.
