By: Jay Alvarez
Submitted: 2010-05-17 22:27:34 | Word Count: 684
When an HIV infected dentist failed to employ sufficient precautionary measures some patients diagnosed to have HIV put the blame on him but federal and Florida based researchers now find this to be impossible. There are no similarities with regard to the conclusions derived from the two cases involving HIV positive dentists with an earlier case being recorded as the only instance where a physician infects a patient.
The health department and federal centers studied the virus contracted by the dentist making use of DNA sequencing to determine the HIV strain. Findings provided sufficient information regarding the evidence of different HIV strains in the dentist and patients.
[ advertisement ]
The patients found out that their strains came from different sources and that one did not infect the other and there were also findings that deemed the unclean dental implements completely irrelevant. This follow up helps put the investigation in better perspective. The chances of a patient being infected with viruses from a dentist are minute and this low risk factor defeats the need for mandatory health check ups.
In an effort to save others from experiencing the same fate one of the six people infected by the first dentist started a crusade so physicians will be obligated to undergo mandatory health exams. Populations of indigents were affected by the AIDS epidemic but this did not prevent the second dentist from extending medical assistance. It only took three years for the dentist to succumb to the HIV he contracted.
24 out of the 19% of patients he treated during his last five years of service tested positive for the HIV virus after getting tested. Even without testing four patients found out that they were HIV positive. People who have HIV usually develop behavioral risks and the study of the 28 patients delivered the results informing that 24 out of the 28 are susceptible. The availability of DNA sequencing allowed more clarifications to be done regarding how different the HIV strain of the dentist is to the strain from his patients.
Since there were a number of different HIV strains present during testing the patients probably contracted the virus from external sources and not the dentist. Findings resulted to a number of different strains of the virus and this means that each one of them was infected by independent sources. There was another theory pertaining to dental implements being exposed to blood and tissue causing the infections to happen.
Controlling people's misconceptions about the dental field may now be possible especially with the dawn of new evidences according to AIDS experts. As relevant findings are shared by the center for disease control the director of the HIV sequence database and analysis project believes that current events may strengthen these findings. Alarming cases of HIV transmissions in today's world further supports the high chances of another case like this happening in a few years as said by those from the quasi governmental organization who work on HIV strains. Tremendous support is given to the American dental profession by current findings in line with their ongoing campaign to implement safe practices.
Efforts from the dental field during the previous years were somewhat limited but as the case winds down more infection control procedures are being made visible today. Mandatory health checks for physicians should remain enforced as a lawyer for the AIDS victim argues because every patient is entitled to know about any potential risks from a physician that he might be susceptible to. Case in point a number of patients got infected by HIV and whether the dentist acted negligently or not it is the responsibility of public health services to provide patients with adequate protection.
Author Resource:-
You will find that further information on braces sydney nsw is on that site. When you would like to get more information on teeth braces sydney check out this site.
