Good Info
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
     
Categories

Accessories
Arts
Arts and Crafts
Automotive
Business
Business Management
Career
Cars and Trucks
CGI
Coding Sites
Computers
Computers and Technology
Cooking
Crafts
Current Affairs
Databases
Education
Entertainment
Film
Finances
Gardening
Healthy Living
Holidays
Home
Home Management
Internet
Medical
Medical Business
Medicines and Remedies
Men Only
Motorcyles
Our Pets
Outdoors
Pets
Psychiatry & Mental Heal
Recreation
Relationships
Religion
Self Improvement
Society
Sports
Staying Fit
Technology
Travel
Web Design
Weddings
Wellness, Fitness and Di
Women Only
Womens Interest
Writing
 
Stats
Total Articles: 811103
Total Authors: 79868


Newest Member
Craig Read

Opt-out eyed


By: Health Insurance
Submitted: 2010-01-02 11:28:36 | Word Count: 409


Even without knowing what the final form of any federal health care reform will be, three Oklahoma lawmakers have decided they want to give Oklahomans the opportunity to wash their hands of it.

Republican Reps. Mike Ritze, Broken Arrow, and Mike Reynolds, Oklahoma City, and Sen. Randy Brogdon, Owasso, say they will file the Freedom of Healthcare Choice Act, which they say will allow voters to opt out of any federal system ultimately approved by Congress.

[ advertisement ]

In a press release posted on his state House Web site, Ritze said: "It's clear the overwhelming majority of Americans want the current doctor-patient relationship preserved instead of having Washington bureaucrats dictate medical decisions. ... My legislation would give the voters the ability to protect and preserve their existing health care coverage."

The three GOP lawmakers said their proposed constitutional amendment, modeled after an Arizona proposal, would prohibit any law or rule compelling anyone to participate in any system, and would allow any Oklahoman to pay directly for or provide health care services without paying any penalty or fine.

It also would stipulate that subject to reasonable rules, the purchase or sale of private insurance would not be prohibited.

If all these three lawmakers want to do is preserve the right of Oklahomans to retain their existing health coverage, then that's all well and good.

But what about those who have no health care coverage, or who are underinsured? What about the children of
families who don't qualify for Medicaid? What about working Oklahomans whose employers don't provide coverage? What about people with pre-existing conditions who can't get coverage, or those who lost their coverage when they developed health problems? Would this amendment affect their ability to access any reforms Congress adopts?

Remember, Oklahoma ranks near the bottom in nearly all measures of health and well-being, and has among the highest uninsured rates in the country.

No doubt there are many Oklahomans who want to retain the coverage they have, but there are tens of thousands of others who want nothing more in life than access to decent health care. Our leaders should remember they represent them, too

Author Resource:- Quoting

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
New Members
Nav Menu
Sponsors



Featured Authors
Name: Betsy Brown Conan
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: Phoenix
State: AZ
View My Bio & Articles

Name: markhenrydscd Fadner
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: newyork
State: newyork
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Charlotte Archange
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: New York
State: New York
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Roland Hughes
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: Will clayton
State: Humble
View My Bio & Articles

Name: jen morke
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: Van Nuys
State: CA
View My Bio & Articles