Good Info
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
     
Categories

Accessories
Arts
Arts and Crafts
Automotive
Business
Business Management
Career
Cars and Trucks
CGI
Coding Sites
Computers
Computers and Technology
Cooking
Crafts
Current Affairs
Databases
Education
Entertainment
Film
Finances
Gardening
Healthy Living
Holidays
Home
Home Management
Internet
Medical
Medical Business
Medicines and Remedies
Men Only
Motorcyles
Our Pets
Outdoors
Pets
Psychiatry & Mental Heal
Recreation
Relationships
Religion
Self Improvement
Society
Sports
Staying Fit
Technology
Travel
Web Design
Weddings
Wellness, Fitness and Di
Women Only
Womens Interest
Writing
 
Stats
Total Articles: 810220
Total Authors: 79868


Newest Member
Craig Read

Cost of legislation


By: Health Insurance
Submitted: 2009-12-02 15:35:42 | Word Count: 687


Remember when health care reform was supposed to make life better for Coloradans? Well, reform efforts have taken an unexpected, and unfortunate, turn in recent weeks.

As two studies recently released by noted international consultants PricewaterhouseCoopers, and Oliver Wyman, Inc., show, major provisions in the current legislative proposals will cause health care costs to increase far faster and higher than they would even under the current system. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield followed with another actuarial study that looked at what legislation would do to Coloradan's premiums, and found much the same.

[ advertisement ]

Many elected officials are expressing outrage and indignation that the studies dared be published and have vociferously questioned their veracity. But, the truth is, consumers would be well-served by taking a more reasoned and less political approach to this new information by familiarizing themselves with the findings and then deciding if they ring true.

All of these studies identify a major flaw in the recently passed Senate and House bills around the issue of guaranteed coverage for everyone - regardless of whether or not people have preexisting medical conditions.

To set the record straight, it was the insurance industry that came to the table back in November 2008, offering to sell insurance to any individual who requested coverage, regardless of any pre-existing medical condition - with the caveat that these insurance reforms be coupled with an effective mandate that all Americans purchase insurance. The mandate is essentially the linchpin between expanding coverage and premium affordability.

Instead of creating an enforceable individual mandate, however, both the House and Senate bills establish a clear disincentive for healthy people to secure or maintain coverage. As a result, people will buy coverage only when they get sick and cancel it when they don't need to pay medical bills. This would be the same as allowing people to obtain auto insurance after they have had an accident or secure homeowner's insurance after their house has burned down.

The studies findings in this area have played out in real life. For example, in New York and Vermont, where guaranteed issue was adopted in the individual market without a mandate, average premiums are approximately 60 percent higher than the national average. In New Jersey and Maine, thousands dropped coverage after state health care reform was enacted, resulting in individual markets that were slashed by more than half in both states-markets in which it is now very costly to obtain coverage.

The PricewaterhouseCoopers study showed that a weak individual coverage requirement coupled with a guarantee issue requirements, no pre-existing condition limits, and no rating adjustments based on health status would result in an increase of premiums by 41-54 percent for the average individual premium.

The Oliver Wyman study illustrated that the watering down of individual coverage mandates could result in the ultimate failure of reform by causing premiums to spiral out of control for all those who responsibly purchase coverage.

And, Anthem's study showed that health insurance costs would rise dramatically in Colorado if current federal reform proposals become law. For example, a healthy 25-year-old man in Denver would face an increase of 140 percent.

Are these biased studies commissioned by the insurance industry, that say only what the industry wants you to hear? Read the reports and judge for yourself.

It is critically important that we hold our elected officials to the highest standard and ask that their efforts to reform health care are more than just political theatre. Reform needs to incorporate the very best thinking on these complex issues in order that the final legislation serves to lower the cost of health insurance, improve the quality of health care and increase access to all Americans. Passing health care reform is an enormously difficult political challenge, getting it right is the only point of doing it

Author Resource:- Quoting

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
New Members
Nav Menu
Sponsors



Featured Authors
Name: Betsy Brown Conan
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: Phoenix
State: AZ
View My Bio & Articles

Name: markhenrydscd Fadner
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: newyork
State: newyork
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Charlotte Archange
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: New York
State: New York
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Roland Hughes
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: Will clayton
State: Humble
View My Bio & Articles

Name: jen morke
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: Van Nuys
State: CA
View My Bio & Articles