Good Info
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
     
Categories

Accessories
Arts
Arts and Crafts
Automotive
Business
Business Management
Career
Cars and Trucks
CGI
Coding Sites
Computers
Computers and Technology
Cooking
Crafts
Current Affairs
Databases
Education
Entertainment
Film
Finances
Gardening
Healthy Living
Holidays
Home
Home Management
Internet
Medical
Medical Business
Medicines and Remedies
Men Only
Motorcyles
Our Pets
Outdoors
Pets
Psychiatry & Mental Heal
Recreation
Relationships
Religion
Self Improvement
Society
Sports
Staying Fit
Technology
Travel
Web Design
Weddings
Wellness, Fitness and Di
Women Only
Womens Interest
Writing
 
Stats
Total Articles: 810220
Total Authors: 79768


Newest Member
Kim Willis

Kansas lawmakers look for a way out of federal insurance mandate


By: Health Insurance
Submitted: 2009-11-08 10:11:58 | Word Count: 363


Three Republican lawmakers in Kansas want to give the state an opt-out should Congress pass health reforms that mandate individual health insurance.

Their proposal, which would alter the Kansas Constitution, is similar to efforts under way in more than half the states, including Missouri. It’s a pointed attempt to get President Barack Obama and Congress to back off efforts to retool the nation’s health care system.

[ advertisement ]

“Kansas citizens have a right to make their own health care decisions without federal czars,” said Sen. Mary Pilcher-Cook, a Shawnee Republican and one of the three sponsors of the proposed amendment.

The amendment would say no law can require individuals or employers to buy health insurance.

To be added to the state constitution, the legislation must be passed by a two-thirds majority of both the Kansas House and Senate and then approved by voters next year.

Pilcher-Cook, along with Rep. Brenda Landwehr of Wichita, and Rep. Peggy Mast of Emporia, announced the legislation Tuesday and predicted it would be a key debate of the upcoming session, which begins in January.

Democrats were quick to note that all three lawmakers receive taxpayer-funded health insurance. Kenny Johnston, the party’s executive director, called it hypocritical to try to block health reforms while getting coverage on the public’s dime.

“For many Kansans, these extreme right Republicans would eliminate the best hope for affordable coverage,” Johnston said. “… Just saying ‘no’ is not a solution.”

But the legislation’s sponsors insisted they’re not against reforms, only federal mandates.

“We were created to have state sovereignty,” Landwehr said. “We were not set up to have the federal government tell the states who, what, when, where and how.”

Landwehr and Pilcher-Cook said they don’t believe the amendment, if successful, would put the state in jeopardy of losing federal health care funds.

Author Resource:- Quoting

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
New Members
Nav Menu
Sponsors



Featured Authors
Name: Gary Amla
Joined: 2012-05-18
City: Alaska
State: AL
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Melvin Christopher
Joined: 2012-05-17
City: New York
State: United States Of America
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Julie Spooner
Joined: 2012-05-17
City: calfornia
State: CA
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Glenn Driscoll
Joined: 2012-05-17
City: ABBOTSFORD
State: VIC
View My Bio & Articles

Name: Lucille Demers
Joined: 2012-05-17
City: city
State: state
View My Bio & Articles